Michael Burgos from Grassroots Apologetics joins me to discuss his recent debate on my show with Oneness Pentecostal, James Anderson. This episode contains the first half of the discussion; see episode 42, “Post Mortem,” for the second half.
Music
- The Benjy Davis Project, The Aftermath, from the Lost Souls Like Us album (Amazon exclusive), 2010
Promoted Resources
- Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry(CARM)
- Listen to CARM radio’s Faith and Reason Radio live with Matt Slick, Monday through Friday, 4-5pm PST on KSPD, Boise Idaho, AM 790
- Or subscribe to the podcast
- Michael’s Grassroots Apologeticsblog
- Michael’s article, “An Examination and Refutation of Modal Communication“
Chris,
I love your show, but this discussion really left me scratching my head. Your guest claimed that to interpret the plain meaning of personal pronouns in the OT is a “unitarian presupposition” is really indefensible. I am not a oneness Pentecostal, nor a modalist, but your guest had it completely backwards – to assume that personal pronouns are not, in fact, personal pronouns shows a clear trinitarian bias and begs the question in the most obvious way. I think there are more compelling arguments for the trinity, but this one really deserves a more spirited challenge than what you gave it.
-Regards-